openvoxvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openvox | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 40 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 7 |
| Latest release | 8.31.2 · 29 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.
openvox ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.
PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).
openvox details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep openvox, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with