OpenTripPlannervsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenTripPlanner | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Navigation | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 766 | 41 075 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +2 861 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.10.0 · 9 Sept 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 64/100 for OpenTripPlanner, so it is the safer default.
Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenTripPlanner.
If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; OpenTripPlanner needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 861 stars in 30 days).
OpenTripPlanner details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenTripPlanner, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with