Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vsOpenTripPlanner
Two self-hosted Navigation projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | OpenTripPlanner | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #4 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 8 177 | 2 766 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v2.10.0 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 64/100 for OpenTripPlanner, so it is the safer default.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenTripPlanner.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is easier to run; OpenTripPlanner needs more configuration.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →OpenTripPlanner details →All Navigation projects →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep OpenTripPlanner, compare it with