OpenStreetMapvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenStreetMap | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 868 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 66/100 for OpenStreetMap, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.
OpenStreetMap is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenStreetMap details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenStreetMap, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with