Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) needs more configuration.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with