GeoServervsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GeoServer | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 4 485 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.27.7 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
GeoServer scores 71/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
GeoServer ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; GeoServer needs more configuration.
GeoServer is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).
GeoServer details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep GeoServer, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with