OpenStreetMapvsOpenTripPlanner
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenStreetMap | OpenTripPlanner | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #4 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 2 867 | 2 766 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v2.10.0 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |
Which one should you pick?
OpenStreetMap scores 66/100 against 64/100 for OpenTripPlanner, so it is the safer default.
OpenTripPlanner ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenStreetMap.
OpenStreetMap details →OpenTripPlanner details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenStreetMap, compare it with
Keep OpenTripPlanner, compare it with