openobservevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 22 584 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +463 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, openobserve is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+463 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with