World MonitorvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 89 739 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 400 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 400 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with