openobservevstextpod
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | textpod | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #54 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 22 591 | 322 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +470 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | 0.1.8 · 29 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 45/100 for textpod, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for textpod.
If you want the quickest setup, textpod is easier to run; openobserve needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →textpod details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep textpod, compare it with