openobservevsterrapod
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | terrapod | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #8 of 8 in DevOps |
| GitHub stars | 22 592 | 264 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 43 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.11.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 51/100 for terrapod, so it is the safer default.
terrapod ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for openobserve.
If you want the quickest setup, openobserve is easier to run; terrapod needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →terrapod details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep terrapod, compare it with