openITCOCKPITvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openITCOCKPIT | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 403 | 24 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +781 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | openITCOCKPIT-5.9.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 54/100 for openITCOCKPIT, so it is the safer default.
openITCOCKPIT ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, openITCOCKPIT is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).
openITCOCKPIT details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep openITCOCKPIT, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with