openHop RepeatervsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openHop Repeater | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 7 |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
openHop Repeater details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep openHop Repeater, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with