openGymvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openGym | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 17 021 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 852 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 26 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
openGym scores 81/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
openGym ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, openGym is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
openGym is growing faster right now (+2 852 stars in 30 days).
openGym details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep openGym, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with