UUSEC WAFvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UUSEC WAF | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
UUSEC WAF details →Workout.cool details →