OpenELIS GlobalvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenELIS Global | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 4 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; OpenELIS Global needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
OpenELIS Global details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with