OpenELIS GlobalvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenELIS Global | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 5 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; OpenELIS Global needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
OpenELIS Global details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with