OpenELIS GlobalvsTelegraf
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenELIS Global | Telegraf | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 17 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +62 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 16 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.40.2 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Telegraf scores 78/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
Telegraf ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for OpenELIS Global.
If you want the quickest setup, Telegraf is easier to run; OpenELIS Global needs more configuration.
Telegraf is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).
OpenELIS Global details →Telegraf details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with
Keep Telegraf, compare it with