OpenELIS Globalvssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenELIS Global | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 45 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +839 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 22 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for OpenELIS Global.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).
OpenELIS Global details →sentry details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with
Keep sentry, compare it with