openclawvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 393 312 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 888 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →QGIS Web Client details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with