llama.cppvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1465 | 10 |
| Latest release | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →QGIS Web Client details →