openclawvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 393 312 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 888 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with