llama.cppvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 | 11 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →qm-music details →