OmniVoice-Studiovsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 141 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with