openclaw-command-centervsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw-command-center | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #110 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 248 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 8 Mar 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 48/100 for openclaw-command-center, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for openclaw-command-center.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw-command-center is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
openclaw-command-center details →OpenReader details →