OpenReadervsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 549 | 108 555 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +8 648 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 648 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with