OpencastvsTwenty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Opencast | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #38 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 509 | 60 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 595 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | ECL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Twenty scores 84/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.
Opencast ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.
If you want the quickest setup, Twenty is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 595 stars in 30 days).
Opencast details →Twenty details →