OpencastvsSonarr
Two self-hosted Media Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Opencast | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 509 | 17 472 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +975 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 34 |
| Latest release | 19.10 · 28 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | ECL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sonarr scores 81/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Opencast.
If you want the quickest setup, Sonarr is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
Sonarr is growing faster right now (+975 stars in 30 days).
Opencast details →Sonarr details →All Media Management projects →