OpencastvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Opencast | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #38 of 142 in Media Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 509 | 47 728 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | ECL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.
Opencast ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
Opencast details →Text Generation WebUI details →