Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 71/100 for Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), so it is the safer default.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with