OpenDesignvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenDesign | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Design | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 104 814 | 24 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 983 | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | open-design-v0.26.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenDesign scores 83/100 against 82/100 for temporal, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenDesign.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenDesign is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
OpenDesign is growing faster right now (+1 983 stars in 30 days).
OpenDesign details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenDesign, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with