open-computevsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-compute | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Serverless | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 457 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 55/100 for open-compute, so it is the safer default.
open-compute ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, open-compute is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
open-compute details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep open-compute, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with