faasvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 26 254 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
faas details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with