OmniVoice-StudiovsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 92 515 | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 574 | +244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 31 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP).
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 574 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with