Fish SpeechvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 33 452 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 31 |
| Latest release | — | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with