OmniVoice-StudiovsQuestarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | Questarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 93 286 | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 012 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →Questarr details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep Questarr, compare it with