OpenReadervsQuestarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Questarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #38 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Questarr details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Questarr, compare it with