Fish SpeechvsQuestarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Questarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
Questarr ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Questarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Questarr, compare it with