OJSvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OJS | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OJS scores 62/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.
OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
OJS details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep OJS, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with