OctoprintvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Octoprint scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.
Octoprint is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →Upptime details →