OctoprintvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 28 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →SeaweedFS details →