Octoprintvsrsyslog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | rsyslog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 9 170 | 2 344 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Octoprint scores 73/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.
If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
Octoprint is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →rsyslog details →