octo-servervsOwncast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| octo-server | Owncast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 110 in Chat | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 1 101 | 11 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.24.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Owncast scores 73/100 against 53/100 for octo-server, so it is the safer default.
octo-server ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.
If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; octo-server needs more configuration.
Owncast is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
octo-server details →Owncast details →
Swap a project
Keep octo-server, compare it with
Keep Owncast, compare it with