octo-servervsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| octo-server | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 110 in Chat | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 101 | 393 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 947 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 37 |
| Latest release | v1.24.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 53/100 for octo-server, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for octo-server.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; octo-server needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).
octo-server details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep octo-server, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with