chatwootvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 38 512 | 393 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 390 | +2 947 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 37 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →openclaw details →