ObscuravsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Obscura | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 29 544 | 2 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +460 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Obscura scores 75/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; WebCodex needs more configuration.
Obscura is growing faster right now (+460 stars in 30 days).
Obscura details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep Obscura, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with