firecrawlvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 196 454 | 2 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 111 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 111 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with