NomadvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 17 056 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 77/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with