NomadvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 11 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with