actions-runner-controllervsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →TradingAgents details →